Serious Complaints regarding the LMU Eye Clinic
Schwerwiegende Beschwerden bezüglich der
Augenklinik der LMU
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Munich
Augenklinik der Universität München
Directed by Professor Dr. Siegfried Priglinger and Dr. Armin Wolf

Dr Siegfried Priglinger Director of LMU Eye Clinic, and right surgeon Prof.
Dr Armin Wolf
PUBLIC WARNING:
At first appearances, Munich University's Ophtalmology department, which runs
the eye clinic, seems to be a well equiped and busy medical practice, however,
the number of complaints by patients registered on Google alone, and the nature
of those complaints, raises great concern.
Of 284 reviews over 190 are complaints about the service and treatment,
ranging from annoyance at long delays and rudeness, to serious malpractice.
One reviewer states "Never go there. Better pop your eye out with a kitchen
knife, you’ll be doing yourself a favor."
another writes "An obviously overloaded emergency room. Unfortunately, I have
not been told consistently about available doctors and I have to wait a long
time, so I'm in another practice."
The list is
endless, including a complaint that Dr Wolf mislead a patient,
performing an uncessary operation which left him partially blind in one eye.
Case study: We have decided to investigate some of the more
serious complaints, one from a British man visiting a friend in Munich, an ex
Lufthansa pilot who had a good opinion of the LMU. The man had a minor
problem with his right eye due to mild inflamation in the periphery of his
retina that was causing a tiny patch of darkness in his extreme left-top
peripheral vision in the evenings, but that cleared up by morning. His vision
was still better than 2020 with correction in both eyes, with -3.75 dipoters,
and he could focus in all ranges. He had previously been to optometrists
regarding this problem, but they had been unable to find any problems.
Following his friend's recomendation, he decided to visit the clinic, and
after a 4 hours wait, was revised by a junior ophtamologist who had difficulty
locating the problem area. The patient, having had the same problem
earlier with optometrists, suggested that they use an indirect binocular
ophtamoloscope, which allowed them to see the extreme peripher area of his
retina, where they finally found a slight puckering in the retina.
The patient was refered to Dr Armin Wolf, who advised the patient that an
immediate operation was necessary or the patient could lose his sight. He
asked the patient if he wanted a scleral buckle or a vitrectomy, to which the
surprised patient replied, "how should I chose?".
Dr Wolf then said, reportedly with some impatience "I don't have time, I will
perform the vitrectomy because otherwise I cannot be sure of a good result.",
and that many patients were waiting so there was not time for further
discussion. Having read while waiting that vitrectomies can lead to cataract
development, the patient then asked Dr Wolf's view, and was told by Dr Wolf that
"we have not seen a cataract develop here following many years of operations".
Given the advice that he could lose his vision, he decided to trust Dr Wolf,
and the following morning had been preped for the operation, when suddenly the
accounts manager of the LMU entered his room requesting €4,000 in cash or they
could not operate, as the patients medical insurance from the UK could not be
confirmed in time. This was then paid, and the operation proceeded.
Following the operation the eye was badly swollen and
bloody, and when Dr Wolf visited the patient he apologised that
they had not found that there was inflamation, uveitis, until after they had
removed the vitreous gel from his eye, and that what was needed was a single
treatment of corticosteroids. Dr Wolf immediately walked away without further
comment.
After 3 weeks with no vision in the operated eye due to the gas that had been
injected at LMU, the sight cleared, but the myopia had increased by -3 dipoters
to -7, with considerable double vision. In the following months the mypoia
increased to -12 with all clarity of vision lost, and a level of myopia that
cannot be correctd by glasses.
During this period the patient attempted to ask the Clinic what had happened
and what could be done, however both Dr Wolf and Dr Priglinger refused to
comment, and stopped replying to correspondence.
The patient had to ask a lawyer for help to obtain his medical files, but
after 6 weeks without a response from the LMU, the lawyer had to threaten legal
action against the LMU Eye Clinic.
The response from LMU was an invoice for copy costs, which was promptly paid,
however only the briefest of documents were sent, there was no medical overview,
and the copy of the video of the operation was denied by LMU.
As the LMU Eye Clinic is part of Munich University, we have concerns that
student doctors may be practicing on patients, something that with the refusal
to supply the video of the operation, we cannot at this point confirm.
In numerous complaints made against the LMU Eye Clinic,
patients state that the clinic refuses to give out information in written
format, and we suspect that this is for legal reasons to protect the clinic from
malpractice cases.
Opinion of the CPD:
Clearly given so many complaints
against a medical facility, something is seriously wrong.
With many complaints of hours of
delays in the emergency unit, it is clear that the LMU is overloaded, and that
can lead to mistakes.
Worst of all are the reports of
misinformation being given to patients by Dr Wolf, that the clinic refuses or
delays requests by patients for copies of their files, and that when pressed by
patient's lawyers, this clinic sends less than the expected minimum of
information, including ignoring requests for copies of the mandatory video made
during operations. We are concerned that patients may be being used for
training of student surgeons, and are attempting to verify this with the
authorities.
We do not advise the public to
visit this clinic unless there is absolutely no alternative.
Our investigations are ongoing and
we will publish more details shortly.
We
DEMAND that the German Medical
Board investigate these complaints against the LMU Eye Clinic with upmost
urgency.
If you also have a complaint
against the LMU please contact us.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Join our fight for better services!
:-
info@information-point.com
Send mail to
info@information-point.com with questions
or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2005-19
Information Point Centre
Last modified:
December 31, 2019